The trees slow growth over time and season can be deciphered
from its rings, but can also be read in Roger Rigorths
scu!ptures.
An artist working in wood keeps his eye on this time factor.
The presence of natural materials such as the wood he uses
has all the more effect, the more the virtual and the artificial,
in all areas of life, place themselves into our fleld of Vision.
The effect of wood is amplified, furthermore, by the symbolism
of trees, long established in virtually all cultural settings,
a symbolism that can be called archetypal (1). But Rigorth
not only works with wood, but also with related materials
such as coconut fibre and paper, both derived from trees.
In addition, he uses clay and, for some time now, lead and
iron. More recently he has also used steel in cone-shaped
objects. These, however, do not have their ongins in the tree.
These natural materials have their roots in the artists
proximity to nature, in his encounters with nature and his
life in it. lt begins with a forest tree he has himself sought
out and felled. So it is worked on by the sculptor from the
very beginning. His craft skilis then expand according to
need to enable hirn to continue with the work.
The motif of the boat or boat-shaped objects plays an important
role in Rigorths work. In addition, he has other series
of works, for example some almost egg-shaped wooden sculptures
(Flight of Stars). Then there are the so-called ,windspoons»
- high steles shaped like a long boat at their ends, often
plaited with coconut twine, and initially cut from the wood.
Recently there have been the above-mentioned ,,cones
constructed out of steel funnels. At first these were fixed
to a wooden block and are now planned as mobile figures.
Rigorths chosen boat form entails both a high level
of craft skill and knowledge of its history as a symbol. Conceivably
it served originally as a personal liberation from a style
of working that was excessively craft-based in favour of the
free sculptural object Rigorths first freer works
were masks. In his initial boats, he still adheres rather
closely to the methods of constructing eskimo boats, of which
he had read. lnitially, they are only altered here and there,
with for instance the original entry hole tumed 90 degrees
and thus emancipated into a free round form. The boats become
model-like, partially covered, and cut open. The covering
is not, as in the original, of birch bark, but of paper, which
is indeed a product derived from wood, but which renders impossible
the principal function of a boat, namely to float. This is
henceforth an ever recumng feature, now determined by the
material or gravity, now by form and execution.
The next step in the development of Rigorths boats is
a corpus of wood that is initially partially hollowed out
and then becomes solid. lnterestingly, this prompts one to
think in reverse sequence of the historical ethnology and
spread of boats, since the wooden boats are a reminder of
the hollowed out tree trunks that are found in many places
the world over and represent one of the oldest types of boat.
Amongst other places they are to be found in Australia and
Korea, locations that Rigorth has visited in the course of
study trips and symposia.
To pursue all the analogies would be excessive here and would
require a more detailed analysis. Thus 1 enumerate below some
that are especially salient.
The relation of clay and wood that occurs in Rigorths
older, 1997, work, ,,Oberer Totpunkt (,,Upper Death
Point) is found in ancient clay rafts in Australia and
South-East Asia. (2)
Additionally, edge elevations of coconut fibre are found
on hollowed out tree-trunk boats in pirogues (3) in Sri Lanka
and coracles in Vietnam. One Rigorth boat, developed from
a
Symposium in Finland, has such an extension in the middle,
as do the so-called ,,wind spoons, which display coconut
fibre plaiting at the top of a split trunk. This is a technique
likewise found in Vietnamese boats, but of course in a different
form. (4)
In any case the idea of using coconut fibre strands has its
boatbuilding counterpart in areas where coconut palms are
faund and coconut fibre rope is still used as weil as the
ubiquitous plastic equivalent. (5)
In Asia there are open-bowed junks, where the two sides of
the wood are thus not joined together. This form is reminiscent
of a small number of Rigorth wooden boats developed from the
shape of a bean pod, whose bow is likewise open. (6)
lt is interesting to note these analogies and to speculate
whether and where the artist might have seen them. How can
these ones enter the vocabulary of forms, where others do
not, and why are they boats? These are questions which cannot
be answered in such a way. lt simply shows the artists
ethnological rootedness and his fascination with old forms
of working wood and, once again, the flowing in of (nature)
observation and the use of natural materials in his work.
Boats were and are above all symbols of travel, both of actual
and imaginary movement. (7)
Travel to the realm of the dead and the boat in the form
of a coffin are special expressions of
this notion. (8)
Rigorths journey is also imaginary, especially as the
boats have quite often, by dint of their material or gravity,
noticeably forfeited their ability to flaat. Or through their
design - wheels, for example, Gut vertically through the body
of the boat. Nonetheless, the idea of the boat always dominates.
The location of some boats, or their photographic documentation,
often depicts an extensive empty landscape. The artists
true journey has already taken place. This is not to do with
easily reached places such as a Korean beach or a piece of
Namibian desert.
An apparent sense of the dramatic in placing the work causes
us, on merely seeing a photograph of it, to sense the wide
open space, to cast our line of vision forward and to fill
the infinitely distant horizon with our yeamings and projections.
In some photographs the perspeotive is chosen so that the
boat almost appears to hoyer just above the horizon.
Simultaneously, the view of the landscape is altered and
accentuated, to strong effect, by just a few means. If the
boat has disappeared again, the effeot is to make the expanse
seem emptier... So the landscape is not background stage scenery
for the work, but part of the statement and becomes a personal
moment despite all the exoticism and broad expanse. Another
interesting aspect of the outdoors setting is that the natural
cycle is completed, with what was once a tree once again placed
back in its former context. (9)
lts alteration is clear and unavoidable, but its proximity
is still visible, as Rigorth not only does not conceive in
colour~ but also does not fully plane the wood, so that signs
of work and grain remain.
Exhibiting in interior settings has by contrast a very sobering
effect, with the absurd sense of the crafts unnavigability
being much clearer. In addition, Rigorth does not emphasise
movement - the very essence of a vehicle. The objects are
still, unmoving. When they are hung, they can often at best
only tum upon their centre of gravity. The wheel in some boats,
while it emphasises the circular form, at the same time completely
prevents all movement.
(10)
Boats in the dry, on frames, ready to sail? Strengthened
sometimes by devices such as a mixture of sail and wing which
almost tum them into ,,airships (*11) The more painful
the impossibility of this kind winged flight becomes, because
of its being anchored to the frame beneath, the less clear
becomes the joumeys destination. The movement is in
the mmd of the viewer.
One thing, however, has been left out of the boats of more
recent years space for a passenger. The hatches of
the early work have gone. This is a clear sign that we are
not confronted with miniature copies of ethnological objects
despite the formal analogies. lnstead these are solid
bodies of wood taking the form of a boat amongst other things.
So it is more that thoughts are being despatched on a joumey
rather than physical bodies. Some recent works have been given
a round bonnet of plaiting or lead which not only fails to
be inviting, but actually seems hermetic and denying. More
like submarines than hollowed out tree boats, they clearly
have more to do with contrasts of form, such as round (the
attachment) versus long (the boat), and horizontal (the boat)
versus vertical (the attachment). This was also the case with
the earlier boats on wooden frames which had a plaster and
gold Govering placed on top. Observe Rigorths work from
this perspective and one notices that he always favours the
rigour of the contrast between the horizontal and the vertical.
There are no diagonals in the objects, except perhaps in the
exhibition installation, as though Rigorth wanted to counter
the all too poetic interpretation of the object with the rigour
of its presentation.
Thus they have lost their function as boats, so that they
could not float, even if they were allowed onto the water.
On the other hand, as symbols of boats they function magnificently,
with evidently only a few features required to activate the
archetype in the viewers mi. But it is too easy to confine
oneself to romanticised interpretations, which would have
us merely see a boat and then immediately direct our thoughts
to the predetermined journey. Eliade describes this with great
accuracy, ,,Everyone saw only the picture they had brought
with them. (12)
Initially, Rigorth made his pieces for himself and not for
others. Only he is acquainted with the process of growth that
links the tree and the completed work, while the viewers
starting point is the flnished product. Fantasies of boats,
all too romantic or poetic, rebound 0ff the rather tacitum
works and the viewer is thrown back on his or her own resources.
But precisely that is the attraction of these boats
only if we take the time to reflect on our own perceptions,
if we allow our thoughts to fly, or indeed float, beyond our
first impressions, will we amve at new ideas about travel,
the need to travel and the yearning for ethnological and ecological
experiences.
And like the tiny paper or leaf boats carrying peoples
wishes, launched every November in a Thai festival, Rigorths
boats are the start of a communication, not its end.
(Translated by Michael Bloom)